Vvandra Hemalatha Himamsu v. Bandalam Rama Murthy Naidu and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to the appellant's absence without representation. No merits to be discussed as the matter was unlisted.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to the appellant's absence without representation. No merits to be discussed as the matter was unlisted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
APPEAL SUIT No.852 of 1997
JUDGMENT:
Despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’, none appears for the appellant and there is no representation on her behalf.
Hence, the Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution, but without costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Appeal shall stand closed.
__________________________________ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
Date: 16.09.2015
Ivd
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
APPEAL SUIT No.187 of 1995
Date: 24.08.2015
Ivd
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court