The Hon'ble Court dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution due to the absence of representation for the appellant on the listed date, with no costs and miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
APPEAL SUIT No. 414 of 1997
JUDGMENT:
When the matter was listed on 06.07.2015, there was no representation for the appellant. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 17.07.2015 under the caption “For Dismissal”.
2. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
3. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution, but however, without costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this appeal suit, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
17th July, 2015 ksm
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
APPEAL SUIT No. 414 of 1997
17th July, 2015
ksm
M. Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
