The court recorded a compromise petition filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. After verifying the terms with both parties, the court allowed the compromise and disposed of the connected applications without costs.
ASMP.No.1413 of 2015 allowed; A.S.No.505 of 2005 disposed of in terms of compromise; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLR SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
AS.MP.NO.1413 OF 2015 AND AS.NO.505 OF 2005
COMMON JUDGMENT:
AS.MP.No.1413 of 2015 is filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure requesting to record compromise on the ground that the matter is settled out of Court. The said compromise is reduced into writing and filed the same along with this petition.
Both parties are present and they are identified by their respective counsel.
The contents of terms of compromise are read over to the parties; they admitted the same to be true and correct. Hence, I find that the compromise to be voluntary.
In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem that it is a fit case to permit both the parties to enter into compromise.
Accordingly, ASMP.No.1413 of 2015 is allowed.
In view of the orders passed in ASMP.No.1413 of 2015, A.S.No.505 of 2005 is disposed of in terms of compromise. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
Registry is directed to annex copy of terms of compromise to the decree.
___________________________ (M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J)
16th July 2015 RRB
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
