The writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous in consequence of counsel's submission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 9196 OF 2008
DATED 3rd December, 2014.
BETWEEN
M.Prakash Rao
….Petitioner
And
A.P. State Trading Corporation Ltd., Hyderabad, rep. by its Vice Chairman & Managing Director. …Respondent.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 9196 OF 2008
ORDER:
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and the subject matter of the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said statement of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions pending consideration if any in the Writ Petition shall stand closed in consequence. No order as to costs.
--------------------------------------------------JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
DATED 3rd December, 2014. Msnrx
M.Prakash Rao
A.P. State Trading Corporation Ltd.
A. Ramalingeswara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
