Petitioner's counsel submitted no further orders were necessary; consequently, the High Court dismissed Writ Petition No.9081 of 2011 without registration of any specific relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT PETITION No.9081 of 2011
BETWEEN
Yelampally Padma.
... PETITIONER
AND
The District Revenue Officer, Khammam District and two others.
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. RAVULAPATI SREENIVASA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE (TG) MR. MIR MASOOD KHAN
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no further orders are necessary to be passed in this writ petition.
Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There
shall be no order as to costs.
_____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J July 3, 2014 DSK
Yelampally Padma
The District Revenue Officer, Khammam District
two others
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
