In this writ petition, the High Court dismissed the matter for non-prosecution after the petitioners and respondents failed to appear on listing dates in March 2014.
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution; pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, are also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.800 of 2006
Date: March 24, 2014
Between:
1. B. Sreeramulu & another … Petitioners
And
1. The Executive Engineer (R & B), Puttur, Puttur Mandal, Chittoor District & 3 others. … Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.800 of 2006
O R D E R:
This case was listed for final hearing on 20.03.2014 and when the matter was called, none appeared for the petitioners as well as the respondents and hence the same was posted to today. Today, in the morning the matter was called and passed over due to absence of counsel for petitioners. In the afternoon, again when the matter is called, none appeared for the petitioners.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for nonprosecution. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand dismissed in consequence. No costs.
RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J
A. Date: March 24, 2014 BSB
17 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.800 of 2006
Date: March 24, 2014
BSB
B. Sreeramulu
The Executive Engineer (R & B), Puttur
3 others
A. Ramalingeswara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
