The high court disposed of a writ petition challenging the suspension of a fair price shop authorization after the authority restored the authorization and ruled that alleged variations did not warrant action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.39937 of 2014 Date:27.12.2014
Between: P.Akka Rao, S/o Musalaiah
..... Petitioner
And:
The State of A.P., reptd by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department, Hyderabad and three others.
.....Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Bollam Lingaiah Yadav For Sri I.Koti Reddy
Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies (AP)
The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside proceedings in Rc.No.5016/2014-B, dated 01.10.2014, of respondent No.2, whereby he has suspended the petitioner’s fair price shop authorization. At the hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies (Andhra Pradesh) placed before the Court a copy of proceedings in Rc.No.5016/2014-B, dated 24.12.2014, of respondent No.2, whereby he has restored the petitioner’s fair price shop authorisation by rendering a finding that the alleged variations do not warrant any action against him.
In view of the corrective steps taken by respondent No.2, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition,
W.P.M.P.No.50082 of 2014 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous.
___________________________ JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY 27th December 2014 DR
P.Akka Rao
The State of A.P.
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
