Disposed

M/s Jana Chaitanya Housing Ltd. v. The Govt. of A.P

Telangana HC8 Jul 2014WP/35235/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenging a dismissal of a stay petition was disposed of. The Court directed the Revenue Divisional Officer to dispose of the pending revision expeditiously after hearing all parties, while maintaining the interim suspension of the lower order.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 2nd respondent to dispose of the pending revision after hearing all parties; interim suspension order to continue.

M/s Jana Chaitanya Housing Ltd. Vs The Govt. of A.P — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2014)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.35235 OF 2013

¶3

Date:08.07.2014

¶4

Between:

¶5

M/s. Jana Chaitanya Housing Limited, Tirupati, rep., by its Chairman and Managing Director Madala Sudhakar .. Petitioner

¶6

And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents

¶7

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR

¶8

WRIT PETITION No.35235 OF 2013

¶9

ORDER:

¶10

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and Sri M. Venkataramana Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.5.

¶11

The petitioner claims that he has purchased the land in question and pattadar passbooks are granted to it. However, aggrieved by the order passed by the Tahsildar, Chandragiri Mandal, vide proceedings in Roc.A/290/2011, dated 17.10.2011, with respect to the land admeasuring Acs.5.19 cents in Survey No.806/1 and connected survey numbers situated at Chandragiri Village, the petitioner has already preferred an appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupati in File No.H/3418/2011, dated 20.06.2013, and the same was disposed of. Aggrieved thereby, a revision was preferred by the petitioner, which is stated to be pending before the 2^nd respondent. However, stay petition filed by the petitioner in the said revision was dismissed under the impugned order in Roc.D4/5465/2013, dated 12.08.2013. Aggrieved by the said dismissal of the stay petition, the present writ petition is filed.

¶12

While issuing notice before admission on 05.12.2013, this Court granted interim order, suspending the orders of the Revenue Divisional Officer, dated 20.06.2013. The said interim order remains in

¶13

force as on today.

¶14

It is not in dispute that the petitioner’s revision is pending with the 2^nd respondent. As such, keeping in view the limited scope of this writ petition, in my view, interests of justice would be better served by directing the 2^nd respondent to consider and dispose of the said revision, after hearing all the parties and pass appropriate orders thereon, expeditiously. The said order of interim suspension granted by this Court on 05.12.2013 shall continue to operate, pending the hearing and disposal of the revision. The contention raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner with regard to jurisdiction of the revenue authorities with respect to the land in question, is also left open to be urged before the revisional authority in the revision, as referred to above.

¶15

Subject to the above, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶16

The miscellaneous petitions, if any, filed in this writ petition shall stand closed.

¶17

____________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J 08.07.2014 KH

M/s Jana Chaitanya Housing Ltd. v. The Govt. of A.P

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Jana Chaitanya Housing Ltd. v. The Govt. of A.P

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Ommi Dali Naidu, S/o Chinnama Naidu, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

K. Sathyamurthy Vs The Joint Collector

Cte Employees Cooperative House Building Society Limited, Vs The District Collector

Mandla Guramma W/o. Raosanna Vs The Revenue Divisional officer, Jammalamadugu

Annapaneni Appa Rao, S/o. Suryanarayana, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its District Collector

S.Narayan Reddy Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh