The court allowed the petitioners' request to withdraw their writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, along with any miscellaneous applications, without any costs awarded.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition allowed; Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
W.P. NO. 32867 OF 2013
Date of Judgment: 10.7.2014
Between:
Anjili Tete and others
…Petitioners
And
The Government of A.P. and others
..Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
W.P. NO. 32867 of 2013
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous applications, if any, are also dismissed. No costs.
_________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J
Dt. 10.7.2014 NB: CC of order be furnished by tomorrow. /BO/ KR
ANJILI TETE AND OTHERS
THE GOVERNMENT OF A.P. AND OTHERS
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
