The writ petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear and reports no instructions. The matter was listed but no advocate could be engaged.
Petition dismissed for default; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed. No other relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
W.P.No.28934 of 2009
ORDER:
Sri K.Manoj Khadkikar, learned counsel, representing Sri P.Hemchandra, learned counsel for the petitioner, reports no instructions in the matter. To that effect, the memo dated 06.12.2014 is filed in the Court vide USR.No.14007 of 2014.
From the record, it appears that the petitioner has not engaged any Advocate to represent the matter.
The writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
___________ S.V.BHATT,J
06th December, 2014 Lrkm
P.Hemchandra
State
S.V.BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
