Allowed

Smt. P.Arun Kumari v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC20 Sept 2014WP/28158/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging eviction proceedings from a Rythu Bazar stall. Relying on a Division Bench order, the Court directed authorities to process fresh licence applications. The petitioner must be continued if selected, otherwise vacate within one week of the result.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to grant a fresh licence to the petitioner if selected, continuing her in possession; otherwise, she must vacate premises within one week of the result.

Smt. P.Arun Kumari Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2014)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY

¶2

Writ Petition No.28158 of 2014

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

This writ petition is filed for a mandamus declaring the action of the 2^nd respondent in issuing impugned proceedings dated 11-09-2014 directing the petitioner to vacate Stall No.66 of Rythu Bazar, Swaraj Maidanm, Vijayawada, Krishna District as illegal and arbitrary and for a consequential direction to respondents to continue the petitioner in the subject as.

¶5

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Agriculture represented that the subject matter of the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order dated 09-04-2014 in W.P.No.32951 of 2013 passed by this court.

¶6

3. However, both the learned counsel have brought to my notice the order dated 15-05-2013 in W.A.No.663 of 2013 and batch, wherein it is observed that the appellants therein were also permitted to apply for fresh licences and when once the appellants are permitted to apply for grant of fresh licences, their eviction in the meanwhile will give rise to complications, in the event of their being granted licences afresh and opined that till exercise of such grant of fresh licences is undertaken, the appellants can be continued in possession.

¶7

4. In view of the observations made by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.663 of 2013 and batch, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to proceed with for granting fresh licence in respect of the premises in question and in the event of the petitioner being selected for grant of licence, she shall be continued. However, if the petitioner is not granted fresh licence, she shall be under obligation to vacate the premises

¶8

within a period of one week from the date of communication of the result of selected licencee. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.

¶9

Let a copy of the order dated 15-05-2013 in W.A.No.663 of 2013 and batch passed by the Division Bench of this Court be annexed to this writ petition.

¶10

_____________________________ A. RAJASHEKER REDDY, J

¶11

Date: 20-09-2014 dv

Smt. P.Arun Kumari v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. P.Arun Kumari v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bodhan Filling Station Vs B Padmavathi

Layam Yeswhanth, Vs The State Government of Andhra Pradesh

Danda Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Basaveswara Rao Vs The State Represented by the Principal

P.R. Narasimha Reddy S/o Rami Reddy Vs The Commissioner, Appeals, O/o the Chief Commissioner

Chatla Triveni, Vs Devaboina Narasavva

Jarpala Gopya , Gopi Vs Smt Usha Rani