Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioner's counsel did not appear on listing date designated for dismissal. No other representation was made.
Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; miscellaneous petitions, if any, also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION No.21054 of 2013
ORDER:
As none appeared for the petitioner on 18.06.2014, the Writ Petition was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal”. Today, though the Writ Petition is listed under the caption “for dismissal”, neither is the learned counsel for the petitioner present nor is there any representation on his behalf.
The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed for
non-prosecution. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J Date:09.07.2014.
cs
Petitioner
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
