Petitioners challenged the execution of an order in OP.No.45 of 1983. The petition was dismissed as the order had already been executed.
The writ petition was dismissed; miscellaneous applications are closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT PETITION No.21007 of 2011
BETWEEN
Talari Ramadevi and others.
... PETITIONERS
AND
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur District and two others.
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioners: MR. K. SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE SMT. A. ANASUYA
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed by five petitioners, who are opposing the execution of the order in OP.No.45 of 1983. 2. Since the said order is already executed, as recorded in WP.No.19359 of 2011 dated 14.07.2014, nothing further survives for consideration in this
writ petition.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
_____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J
July 14, 2014 DSK
Talari Ramadevi and others
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur District
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
