D.V.M.K. Prasad, v. the State of a.P., rep by its
Case brief
What is this about?
The Writ Petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioner. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.
The Writ Petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioner. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU AND
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE ANIS
WRIT PETITION No.20941 OF 2003
ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice K.C.Bhanu)
When the matter had come up on 15.10.2014, none appeared for the petitioner, and therefore, the matter was posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter has come up, none appears for the petitioner and there is no representation on his behalf.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
______________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU
_________ JUSTICE ANIS
OCTOBER 17, 2014 YVL
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU AND
THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIS
WRIT PETITION No.20941 OF 2003
DATE: 17.10.2014
YVL
Justice K.C.Bhanu
Justice Anis
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court