Accepted that subject matter covered by Supreme Court judgment in Karnataka Bank Ltd v. State of A.P, consequently dismissed two Writ Petitions and pending miscellaneous petitions with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION No.20924 OF 2002
ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
Both Sri S. Dwarakanath, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, and S Balaji Varma, Learned Special Standing Counsel for Commercial Taxes, wo agree that the subject matter of these two Writ Petitions are covered by judgment of the Supreme Court in Karnataka Bank Ltd v. State of A.P[1] consequently the Writ Petitions are liable to be dismissed.
Following the said judgment and in terms thereof, this Writ Petition is a dismissed. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also st dismissed. No costs.
_____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J
__________________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY,J
21.08.2014
MRKR
[1] (2008) 2 SCC 254
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Karnataka Bank Ltd v. State of A.PFollowed¶5
(2008) 2 SCC 254 · Who else cites this
Ramesh Ranganathan
M. Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
