The civil miscellaneous appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the appellant nor any representative appeared on the date of listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.3897 of 2003
JUDGMENT: (per RR,J)
Since none appeared for the appellant on 13.08.2014, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither the counsel for the appellant is present nor is there any representation on his behalf. Hence the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. However, in the circumstances, without costs.
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY,J
Date:20.08.2014 usd
Ramesh Ranganathan
M. Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
