The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous based on the counsels submission that the cause of action did not survive for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI
W.P.No.19536 of 2009
Between:
1. Sri Veereshawara Swami Temple Rep. by its Founder Family Member M.V. Ramalingeshwar Rao, and another
PETITIONERS
AND
1. The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Krishna District, Vijayawada, and another.
RESPONDENTS
ORDER:
It is represented by Sri W.B. Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________ JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI. 7th October, 2014 Js.
Sri Veereshawara Swami Temple Rep. by its Founder Family Member M.V. Ramalingeshwar Rao and another
The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Krishna District, Vijayawada and another
A.V. Seshasai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
