The High Court dismissed the writ petition because statutory remedies were available to the petitioners, granting them liberty to pursue such alternative remedies.
Leave granted to pursue alternative statutory remedies; writ petition dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI And
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
WRIT PETITION No.1571 OF 2014
Dated: 24.01.2014
Between: M/s. Kamadhenu & Company and 3 others .. Petitioners And State Bank of India and another
.. Respondents
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI And
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
WRIT PETITION No.1571 OF 2014
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Ms. Justice G.Rohini)
Since the other statutory remedies are available to the petitioners for redressal of their grievance, we are not inclined to entertain the writ petition.
Accordingly, granting leave and liberty to the petitioners to pursue the alternative remedies available under law, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
______________ G.ROHINI, J
_________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J
Date: 24.01.2014 Ivd
M/s. Kamadhenu & Company
State Bank of India
G.ROHINI
T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
