The Court dismissed a writ petition, holding that since an alternative remedy of appeal exists under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, the petition is not maintainable.
Writ Petition dismissed; leave granted with liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI And
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
WRIT PETITION No.1516 OF 2014
Dated: 24.01.2014
Between: Simhadri Saiji Rao and 3 others .. Petitioners And Indian Bank
.. Respondent
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI And
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
WRIT PETITION No.1516 OF 2014
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Ms. Justice G.Rohini)
Since an alternative remedy of appeal is available under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 for redressal of the grievance of the petitioners, we are not inclined to entertain this writ petition.
Accordingly, granting leave and liberty, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
______________
G.ROHINI, J
_________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J
Date: 24.01.2014 Ivd
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable when an alternative remedy of appeal is available.
Whether leave to file the writ petition should be granted.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Simhadri Saiji Rao and 3 others
Indian Bank
G.ROHINI
T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
