A. Udya Rajulu v. The District Collector, kadapa District
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition challenging permission for construction of Dhyana Mandiram, the Court noted that the property had been sold and a residential house built instead. Finding that no issue survives for adjudication, the Court closed the writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed with no order as to costs.
What the court decided
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No.15351 0f 2008
Between:
A. Udya Rajulu
PETITIONER
AND
1. The District Collector, Kadapa District, Kadapa, and others.
RESPONDENTS
ORDER:
This writ petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenges the proceedings Roc. No.2027/2006-A4, dated 15.05.2008, issued by the District collector, Kadapa District, the 1st respondent herein, according permission in favour of the 4th respondent for construction of Dhyana Mandiram in Sy.No.633 Plot No.18 Rjampet Town.
2. This Court while issuing Rule Nisi on 17.07.2008 passed the following order:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives adjudication after the 4th respondent sold the subject property and construction was altered.
Whether the writ petition regarding permission for construction of Dhyana Mandiram is closed due to the property sale and change in construction.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A. Udya Rajulu
- respondent
The District Collector, Kadapa District, Kadapa
- respondent
4th Respondent
- respondent
3rd Respondent
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/15351/2008
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court