This is a one-line order dismissing a writ petition for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's counsel being absent on two consecutive hearing dates. No substantive legal proposition is set out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.11926 of 2010
ORDER:
The learned counsel for petitioner was absent when the case was called on 24.04.2014. Even today also when the case is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall
stand closed.
_______________________________ A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J Date: 04.09.2014 TJMR
Petitioner
A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
