The writ petition became infructuous upon the counsel for the petitioners stating so. The petition was dismissed and other pending miscellaneous petitions were also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION No.10945 of 2012
ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Ashutosh Mohunta)
Sri C. Ramachandra Raju, Learned counsel for the petitioners states that this writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the above statement this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
__________________________________ JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA.
__________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY. Date : 06-02-2014 Rds
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION No.10945 of 2012
Date : 06-02-2014
Rds
Ashutosh Mohunta
M. Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
