Allowed

Y.T.Ramakrishna Reddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC2 Apr 2014WP/10048/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the requirement by Revenue Authorities of No Objection Certificates for registering immovable property documents. The Sub-Registrar was directed to process documents without such NOCs if they meet statutory requirements.

What did the court decide?

The Sub-Registrar, Penukonda, directed to receive and process documents without insisting on NOCs if they meet statutory requirements; denial must be in writing with reasons under Section 71, Registra

Y.T.Ramakrishna Reddy, Vs The State of Andhra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2014)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.10048 of 2014

¶3

Dated : 02.04.2014

¶4

Between:

¶5

Y.T.Ramakrishna Reddy, S/o Tippa Reddy, 65 yrs., Cholemarri Village, Roddam Mandal, Ananthapur District and five others

¶6

.. Petitioners

¶7

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Stamps & Registration Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and two others

¶8

.. Respondents

¶9

This Court made the following :

¶10

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶11

WRIT PETITION No.10048 of 2014

¶12

ORDER :

¶13

In this writ petition the only grievance of the petitioners is with regard to the insistence by the registering authorities on production of ‘No Objection Certificates’ (NOCs) from the Revenue Authorities as a condition precedent for receiving and registering the documents presented by them for registration in connection with immovable properties.

¶14

2. When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for petitioners and

¶15

learned Government Pleader for Revenue submit that the subject matter to the extent of No Objection Certificate is squarely covered by the decision of Division Bench in W.A.No.1653 of 2013. With the consent of both counsel, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. Learned counsel for petitioners also submits that the land in issue is not assigned to Ex-Servicemen.

¶16

3. Considering the submissions of both the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Sub-Registrar, Penukonda, Ananthapuram District (3^rd respondent) to receive and process the documents presented by the petitioner without insisting upon such NOC and in the event the documents presented fulfil the requirements of the Registration Act, 1908, and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, he shall register and release the documents in accordance with the due procedure. However, if the 3^rd respondent is of the opinion that the documents presented for registration warrants denial, he shall pass orders in writing indicating the reasons for such refusal and communicate the same to the party in accordance with Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶17

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.

¶18

__________________________ JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶19

Date : 02.04.2014 ssp

Y.T.Ramakrishna Reddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Y.T.Ramakrishna Reddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Subbaiah, S/o Kondaiah Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Sri M.Ravi Shankar Vs The Government of Ap rep by its Principal Secretary

Abbiraju Lakshmikanthamma W/o Abbiraju Venkata Ramana Raju Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

M/s Saravana Turning works, Vs The Government of A.P rep by its Secretary

S. Konda Reddy, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Polam Shanta, W/o late Polam Madan Mohan, Vs The District Registrar, Red Hills, Hyderabad District