Dismissed

M/s Saravana Turning works, v. The Government of A.P rep by its Secretary

Telangana HC2 Apr 2014WP/10010/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, who purchased a plot from APIIC, approached the Registration Office for registration but was refused. Relying on a prior order, the Court held that the respondents cannot prevent the transaction regarding the specific plot.

What did the court decide?

Declared that respondents 1 to 4 shall not have any right to prevent the petitioner's transaction regarding the plot.

M/s Saravana Turning works, Vs The… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Telangana HC (2014)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.10010 of 2014

¶3

Dated : 02.04.2014

¶4

Between:

¶5

M/s.Saravana Turning works, Tirupathi, Rep. by its Proprietor E.Delhi, S/o T.Ethirajulu, 50 yrs., R/o D.No.13/124, L.B. Nagar, Tirupathi, Chittoor District.

¶6

.. Petitioner

¶7

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department (Registration), Secretariat, Hyderabad and three others

¶8

.. Respondents

¶9

This Court made the following :

¶10

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶11

WRIT PETITION No.10010 of 2014

¶12

ORDER :

¶13

The case of the petitioner is that the land to an extent of Acs.26.00 cents which was covered by Survey No.74/7 of Akkarampalli belongs to Government land and the same was alienated to Tirupati Urban Development Authority. The Tirupati Urban Development Authority has handed over the said land to Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited (for short ‘the APIIC’) for the purpose of establishment of Auto Nagar. The APIIC divided the land into plots. The petitioner purchased plot

¶14

No.274 vide document No.2775 of 2000, dated 16.06.2000. The petitioner has obtained loan from bank and approached the Registrar, Balaji Registration Office, Chittoor District4^th respondent for registration. 4^th respondent refused to receive the document on the ground that the registration was stopped in respect of the land in Survey No.74 of Akkarampalli Village.

¶15

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the land concerning the very same survey number is the subject matter of issue before this Court in several writ petitions. In W.P.No.14439 of 2011, plots purchased by the petitioner therein situated in Survey No.74/7 agitated before this Court against the action of the respondent authorities in not processing the document for registration. This Court disposed of the said writ petition by order, dated 19.01.2012 and observed that the respondent authorities have no right to prevent the petitioner therein from enjoying his absolute rights and consequently directed the respondents 1 to 5 that they shall not have any right to prevent any transaction by the petitioner vis-à-vis the plot allotted to him by the 5^th respondent.

¶16

3. Following the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of holding that respondents 1 to 4 shall not have any right to prevent any transaction by the petitioner vis-à-vis the plot allotted to it by the APIIC. No costs

¶17

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.

¶18

__________________________ JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶19

Date : 02.04.2014 ssp

M/s Saravana Turning works, v. The Government of A.P rep by its Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Saravana Turning works, v. The Government of A.P rep by its Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Subbaiah, S/o Kondaiah Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Sri M.Ravi Shankar Vs The Government of Ap rep by its Principal Secretary

Abbiraju Lakshmikanthamma W/o Abbiraju Venkata Ramana Raju Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Y.T.Ramakrishna Reddy, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

S. Konda Reddy, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Polam Shanta, W/o late Polam Madan Mohan, Vs The District Registrar, Red Hills, Hyderabad District