One-later appeal dismissed as not pressed due to absence of appearance. Miscellaneous petitions closed against background of appellant bundle withdrawal.
Court dismissed the appeal as not pressed and closed miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
LAAS.No.1231 of 2005
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice R. Subhash Reddy)
The appeal was listed for hearing on 11.11.2014. Since there was no representation for the appellants on that day, it was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
Today learned counsel for the appellants submits that his clients have taken away the bundle and he has no instructions.
In that view of the matter, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
The miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed.
____________________________ JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY
_________________________________ JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
12-11-2014 v v
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
LAAS.No.147 of 2006
(Per Hon'ble Sri Justice R.Subhash Reddy)
11th November, 2014
v v
R. SUBHASH REDDY
A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
