Appeals by the Income Tax Department dismissed as similar questions were answered against the Department in a prior order of this Court dated 22.07.2014.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
I.T.T.A.Nos.284 & 313 of 2003
COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy)
These two appeals are filed by the Department feeling aggrieved by the orders in I.T.A.Nos.1866/Hyd/1996 and 87/Hyd/1999, dated 12.07.2001 and 22.01.2003, respectively, passed by the Hyderabad Bench ‘A’ of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The respondent is common in both the appeals.
It is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned counsel for the respondent that similar questions, that are raised in these appeals, were answered against the Department by this Court through its order, dated 22.07.2014 in I.T.T.A.No.6 of 2002.
Following the same, we dismiss both the appeals. There shall be no order as to costs.
The miscellaneous petitions filed in these appeals shall also stand disposed of.
____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J.
_____________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J.
Date:12.11.2014 GJ
Income Tax Department
Respondent
L.NarASimHA reddy
ChALLA kODANDA rAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
