The Court held that the petitioner should have approached the executing court regarding attachment recall. Consequently, it granted leave and disposed of the Civil Revision Petition without costs.
Leave granted; Civil Revision Petition disposed of; No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI And
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.320 OF 2014
Dated: 31.01.2014
Between: Dalapathi Bhuvaneswara Raju .. Petitioner And M/s. Shri Ram City Union Finance Limited, Khammam Branch and 2 others
.. Respondents
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI And
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.320 OF 2014
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Ms. Justice G.Rohini)
Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, it appears to us that the petitioner should have approached the Executing Court for raising the attachment and to recall the warrant before approaching this Court.
Accordingly, granting leave and liberty to the petitioner, the Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Civil Revision Petition shall stand closed.
______________ G.ROHINI, J
_________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J
Date: 31.01.2014 Ivd
Dalapathi Bhuvaneswara Raju
M/s. Shri Ram City Union Finance Limited
G.ROHINI
T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
