The court permitted the appellants to withdraw an appeal suit as the matter was settled out of court, dismissing the appeal accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
APPEAL SUIT No.853 OF 2012
Date: 30.01.2014
Between:
Smt. Haneefa Bee, and nine others
… Appellants
And Manikonda Venkataiah and thirty three others
… Respondents
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
APPEAL SUIT No.853 OF 2012
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Ms. Justice G.Rohini)
The learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the appeal stating that the matter has been settled between the parties out of the Court.
Accordingly, permission is accorded and the Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Appeal Suit, shall stand closed.
G.ROHINI, J
_________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J
Date: 30.01.2014
Note: Issue CC by tomorrow
(B/O) Mva
Smt. Haneefa Bee and nine others
Manikonda Venkataiah and thirty three others
G. Rohini
T. Sunil Chowdary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
