5. As seen from the order of learned Magistrate, it appears that petitioner has received back the amount from respondents 2 and 3, which was sent by a demand draft for Rs.4,56,642=00 and as per the order of learned Magistrate only on the request of complainant the said amount was sent by demand draft to the complainant. Considering the letter addressed by complainant and final report filed by the Police, the learned Magistrate observed that there is no material at least prima facie attracting allegations of cheating. I do not find any wrong in the order of learned Magistrate. Now the contention of petitioner is that there is material and that he may be permitted to produce that material but the same cannot be permitted, because the scope of this Court under section 482 Cr.P.C. is to verify “whether the trial court has committed any error while passing orders without looking into material placed before it”. When the complainant has not produced any witnesses in support of allegations levelled in the protest petition and complaining that trial court has not considered the same cannot be accepted. Therefore, there are no grounds to invoke the jurisdiction of this court under section 482 Cr.P.C.
