Single judge of Hyderabad High Court dismissed a criminal petition seeking quashing of an FIR under Section 420 IPC, holding it infructuous upon receipt of police final report.
Criminal petition dismissed as infructuous; pending miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
THURSDAY THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN
PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR
CRIMINAL PETITION No.6687 OF 2012
Between:
Busa Brama Ramba & Anr. … Petitioners/Accused
V/s.
Busa Srinivas & Anr. … Respondents/complainant
Counsel for Petitioners : Sri Sreekanth Reddy Ambati
Counsel for Respondents : None appeared for R-1 Public Prosecutor for R-2
The court made the following: [order follows]
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 6687 OF 2012
O R D E R :
This Criminal Petition is filed to quash FIR in Crime No. 10 of 2012 of Tenali II-Town Police Station, Guntur District, for alleged offence under section 420 of IPC.
2. When the matter is listed today, Advocate for petitioners represented that final report has been filed by the Police and the matter has become infructuous.
3. Recording the representation of Advocate for petitioners, this Criminal
Petition is dismissed, as infructuous.
4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petition if any, pending in this criminal
petition shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR .
07/08/2014 I s L.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 7 4 8 OF 2012
Circulation No. 10 Date: 07/08/2014 Court Master : I s L Computer No. 43
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the quashing of FIR is maintainable as the matter has become infructuous due to filing of final police report.
Whether the pending miscellaneous petition in the criminal petition should be closed.
Whether the criminal petition filed to quash FIR deserves to be dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Busa Brama Ramba & Anr.
Busa Srinivas & Anr.
S. Ravi Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
