Allowed

Madapathi Mallikarjun v. State of A.P.

Telangana HC17 Apr 2014CRLP/3768/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. granting anticipatory bail to four accused persons involved in matrimonial offences. The court observed that two police officials and two women are accused, which influenced the decision.

What did the court decide?

Released the petitioners on anticipatory bail on surrender within two weeks on a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties.

Madapathi Mallikarjun Vs State of A.P. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Telangana HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN :PRESENT:

¶2

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR CRL.P .No. 3768 of 2014

¶3

Between:-

¶4

1.Madapathi Mallikarjun S/o. Shivamurthy 2.Mrs. Madapathi Parvathi W/o. Madapathi Mallikarjun 3.Mrs. Madapathi Shamantha W/o. Paramesh 4.Madapathi Shivakanth S/o. Mallikarjun.

¶5

.....Petitioners/Accused Nos. 2 to 5 in Cr.No. 23 of 2014 on the file of Warangal Urban Police Station, Warangal District.

¶6

AND

¶7

State of A.P., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.

¶8

. .....Respondent/Complainant. Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the memo of grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to order for enlarging the Petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No. 23 of 2014 of WPS, Warangal Urban, Warangal District pending on the file of the learned Court of I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Warangal on such terms and conditions.

¶9

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the Memo of Grounds filed herein, and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G. Ravi Chandran, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of respondent-State, the Court made the following ORDER :-

¶10

“The petitioners seek for grant of anticipatory bail. The petitioners are A2 to A5. They allegedly committed matrimonial offences. Petitioners 1 and 4 who are A2 and A5 are working as police officials. Petitioners 2 and 3 are women. In view of the calling of petitioners 1 and 4 and the sex of petitioners 2 and 3 and also in view of the nature of the offences alleged against them, I consider it appropriate to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail.

¶11

Accordingly, this Petition is allowed. The petitioners shall surrender before the learned I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Warangal, within two weeks from today. On such surrender, the learned I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Warangal, shall enlarge the petitioners on bail on a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties each in a like sum to his satisfaction.”

¶12

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶13

//TRUE COPY//

¶14

for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶15

To 1.The I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Warangal. 2.The Station House Officer, Warangal Urban Police Station, Warangal District. 3.Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 4.One CC to Sri G. Ravi Chandran, Advocate (OPUC) 5.One spare copy TKK HIGH COURT

¶16

KGS.J

¶17

DATE: 17-04-2014

¶18

ANTICIPATORY BAIL ORDER

¶19

CRL.P. No. 3768 of 2014

¶20

RELEASE THE PETITIONERS ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF

¶21

THEIR ARREST

¶22

DRAFTED BY TKK DT.19-04-2014.

HIGH COURT

KGS.J

DATE: 17-04-2014

ANTICIPATORY BAIL ORDER

¶27

CRL.P. No. 3768 of 2014

¶28

RELEASE THE PETITIONERS ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF THEIR ARREST.

Madapathi Mallikarjun v. State of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madapathi Mallikarjun v. State of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Allamneni Subbarayudu (died) Vs Allamneni Ragamma

K.Kamalavathi Vs The State Bank of India

D.Purnachandra Rao Anantavaram Tenali Vs D.Radhakrishna Murthy Anantavaram AND3 Oth

Mallidi Latchareddy, (died) per Lr Appellant-11 Vs Chinta Sri Panduranga Reddy

Laveti Chandramma Vs Laveti Satyanarayana chari

Kolluri Venkateswara Rao (died) Vs Seeni Krishna Rao