Dismissed

Ramaraju Bhadragiri Rao v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC25 Sept 2014CRLP/11999/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge granted liberty to petitioner-accused to surrender for regular bail instead of dismissing the anticipatory bail petition, imposing conditions including attendance before Sub-Divisional Police Officer and availability for police custody investigations within 15 days.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to surrender for regular bail before Magistrate with conditions regarding attendance and police custody.

Ramaraju Bhadragiri Rao Vs The State of Telangana — Anticipatory Bail | Telangana HC (2014)

¶1

THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.11996, 11997, 11998, 11999 and 12000 of 2014

¶2

COMMON ORDER:

¶3

These Criminal Petitions are filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C by petitioner seeking anticipatory bail in connection with a case in Crime Nos.287/2013, 143 of 2013, 189 of 2013, 144 of 2013 and 372 of 2013 of Devarakonda PS, Chandampet PS, Gudipalli PS, Chandampet PS and Devarakonda PS, Nalgonda District respectively registered for the offences punishable under Sections 409, 420 and 477 IPC.

¶4

2. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, the Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the Respondent-State and perused the material placed on record.

¶5

3. The present petition is filed by the petitioner as the petitioner is apprehending arrest in Crime Nos.287 of 2013 of Devarakonda Police Station, 143 of 2013 of Chandampet Police Station, 189 of 2013 of Gudipalli Police Station, 144 of 2013 of Chandampet Police Station and 372 of 2013 of Devarakonda Police station.

¶6

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is working as General Manager and he is at the verge of retirement, so far he rendered his services to the Bank without any remark.

¶7

5. Having regard to the circumstances stated in the petition as well as the submissions made by the learned counsel, instead of dismissing from not entitled to the pre-arrest bail, but for regular bail in considering his personal liberty, this application is disposed of, by giving liberty to the petitioner-accused to surrender before the Learned Magistrate concerned to take into custody under Section 44 Cr.P.C by virtue of this order, move before the learned Judge/ Magistrate for regular bail and with notice to learned Additional/ Assistant Public Prosecutor concerned and in such an event, the learned Judge/Magistrate shall consider for granting

¶8

of bail in favour of the petitioner with necessary conditions, which includes the petitioner shall attend before the Sub-Divisional Police Officer concerned regularly on every Sunday until further orders apart from his appearance as and when required for further investigation, preferably on the same day if not atleast by the next day.

¶9

6. In the event of the police making out a case for police custody for the purpose of interrogation, the petitioner shall be liable to be taken in police custody for facilitating the further investigation remained if any, with the permission of the Magistrate concerned, within 15 days from today, who can grant such police custody, subject to necessary precautions and instructions as per the constitutional bench expression of Apex Court in guideline No.iv in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Vs. State of Punjab^[1] .

¶10

7. Accordingly, the criminal petitions are disposed of.

¶11

__________________________ Dr. B.SIVA SANKARA RAO J, 25^th September, 2014 knl

¶12

[1] (1980)2 SCC 565

Ramaraju Bhadragiri Rao v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramaraju Bhadragiri Rao v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra Naidu, Vs The State of A.P.

Sri Pallerlamudi Venkata Rajendra Prasad, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Gandham Krishna, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Noor Mohammad Vs The Government of A.P.

Kataru Chinna Maddileti Naidu, Vs State of A.P.

Ramaraju Bhadragiri Rao Vs The State of Telangana