Needless to say, it is the fourth bail application of the petitioner, earlier he moved bail application in Crl.P.No.386 of 2014 before the designated Court and went unsuccessful on 16.07.2014, again he moved another bail application in Crl.P.No.8576 of 2014, that was ended in dismissal on 13.07.2014 and again moved another bail application in Crl.P. No.9673 of 2014, that was dismissed as withdrawn. The averments in bail application are that the investigation is completed and he is not a direct person found with actual possession of the alleged commercial quantity of the contra band – dry ganja, but for he is piloting the car, in which ganja was transporting by the other accused. In fact a bar under Section 37(1)(b) of the NDPS Act that is required to be satisfied to consider the bail application that there are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty of such offence and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on concession of bail. Though his contention can be accepted of there are no bad antecedents even from the police investigation against him and there is nothing to presume that he is likely to commit any other offence; so far as the first rider concerned, there is nothing to show any personal search involved of compliance of the mandatory requirement of Section 50 of NDPS Act much less any mandatory compliance of Section 42 of
