The only grievance of the revision petitioner is that the Court posted the C.C. for more than 3 months, for examination of accused. Even there is a mandate as per the expression of the Apex Court, dated 21.04.2014, in Writ Petition (Civil) No.18 of 2013 between the parties Indian Bank Association and others V. Union of India and others, which is circulated to all the Courts for compliance, to strictly follow Section 143 of N.I. Act and for expeditious disposal and there are directions in para 21 of the Judgment that are to be followed, which include, the Magistrate on the day when the complaint under Section 138 of the Act is presented, shall scrutinize the complaint and, if the complaint is accompanied by the affidavit, and the affidavit and the documents, if any, are found to be in order, take cognizance and direct issuance of summons and adopt a pragmatic and realistic approach while issuing summons. Summons must be properly addressed and sent by post as well as by e-mail address got from the complainant. Court, in appropriate cases, may take the assistance of the police or the nearby Court to serve notice to the accused and need less to say the Court may indicate in the summon that if the accused makes an application for compounding of offences at the first hearing of the case and, if such an application is made, Court may pass appropriate orders at the earliest and such application for compounding and direct the accused to furnish bond under Section 88/89 Cr.P.C., to ensure due appearance to face trial and comply with under Section 251 Cr.P.C. and must ensure that examination-in-chief, cross-examination and re-examination of
