Dismissed
Glory Sampoorna v. State of Ap., Through
Telangana HCCRLP/1007/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN
PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1007 OF 2012
Between: Glory Sampoorna … Petitioners/A-3 V/s. The State of Andhra Pradesh Represented by its Public Prosecutor High Court of AP Hyderabad & Anr. … Respondents/Complainant
Counsel for Petitioner : Sri P. Nagendra Reddy Counsel for Respondents : Public Prosecutor
The Court made the following: [order follows]
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1007 OF 2012
O R D E R :
This Criminal Petition is filed to quash Crime No. 5 of 2012 of Tappachabutra Police Station, Hyderabad.
2. This matter once posted for dismissal on 12/10/2012. On the request of the counsel for petitioner the dismissal caption was deleted and notice was ordered to the second respondent and permission to the counsel for petitioner to take out personal notice by registered post with acknowledgement due and to file proof of service. But the same is not filed and when this matter is listed on 01/4/2014 as per the request of petitioner’s Advocate, petitioner is again permitted to take out notice to second respondent by registered post with acknowledgement due and also by courier and to file proof of service in the Registry. But inspite of such request, no steps have taken and proof of service is not filed. Advocate for petitioner represented that notice was sent but acknowledgement is not returned. When this court asked the Advocate for petitioner to file the postal receipt and courier receipt in proof of service, he requested for a pass over. Accordingly, the matter is
passed over and at 01:30 p.m. two receipts with memo are filed. On verification, it is found that these two receipts disclose that notice was sent after pass over of the matter. Inspite of sufficient time, petitioner has not complied the orders, therefore, this criminal petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, Criminal Petition is dismissed for noncompliance of order.
____________________ JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR .
16/4/2014 I s L
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1007 OF 2012
Circulation No. 134 Date:16/4/2014 Court Master: I s L Computer No.43
Glory Sampoorna
The State of Andhra Pradesh
S. Ravikumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court