Diligent Inestment Ltd. v. Ranklin Soulutions Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Order closing a winding up petition after the petitioner filed proof of having published winding-up notices in newspapers as previously directed by the court.
Order closing a winding up petition after the petitioner filed proof of having published winding-up notices in newspapers as previously directed by the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
Company Petition No.163 of 2011
ORDER:
This Company Petition is filed for an order to wind up the respondent for non-payment of the debt due to the petitioner.
This Court vide order dated 06.08.2014 ordered for winding up of the respondent company and also directed the petitioner to carry out publication of advertisement of the same in two daily newspapers. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has carried out publication of notice of winding up of the respondentcompany under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 in two daily newspapers as ordered by this Court and a Memo is also filed to that effect along with paper publications.
In view of the same, company petition is closed.
_____________________________ A. RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
Date: 13-10-2014 dv
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Respondent Company
A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court