The two civil miscellaneous appeals were dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear and provide representation on the date of hearing.
Both Civil Miscellaneous Appeals Nos. 3250 and 3291 of 2003 were dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY and THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL Nos.3250 and 3291 of 2003
COMMON JUDGMENT: (per RSR, J)
Both these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals submitted by one and the same appellant were listed for hearing on 04.02.2014, on which date, as there was no representation for the appellant, they were directed to be posted today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant.
In that view of the matter, both these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are dismissed for nonprosecution. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending in these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals stand closed.
______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J
5th FEBRUARY, 2014.
________________________ A.SHANKAR NARAYANA, J kvni
R.SUBHASH REDDY
A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
