G.Manoharlal, v. Syed Mahmood Hussain
Case brief
What is this about?
The single-judge court allowed an appeal filed against an order dated 14-3-2014 in E.A.No.268 of 2013. The respondent's counsel conceded the impugned order was unsustainable, leading the court to set it aside as a sequel to dispose of associated interim applications as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Impugned order set aside; appeal allowed; CCCAMP Nos.239 and 332 disposed of as infructuous.