The court disposed of a contempt case where the notice to show cause was withdrawn by the respondents, resulting in the closure of the filing without order as to costs.
Contempt case closed as not pressed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
CONTEMPT CASE No.742 of 2014
JUDGMENT : (per LNR,J)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after the contempt case was filed, the respondents have withdrawn the notice, which according to them constitutes the contempt.
Hence, the contempt case is closed as not pressed, The contempt application filed in this contempt case shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J
_________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
Date: 19.12.2014 JSU
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
CONTEMPT CASE No.742 of 2014
Date: 19.12.2014
JSU
L. Narasimha Reddy
Challa Kodanda Ram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
