The court closed the contempt case after counsel stated that the petitioner could pursue remedies in accordance with law due to orders passed by the respondent. No costs were awarded.
Contempt case closed with liberty to pursue remedies in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
CONTEMPT CASE No.226 of 2014 in WRIT PETITION No.27593 of 2012
Date: October 24, 2014
G. Venkata Swamy … Petitioner
And
1. Sri Purnachandar Rao, IPS, VC & MD, A.P.S.R.T.C, Hyderabad & another. … Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
CONTEMPT CASE No.226 of 2014 in WRIT PETITION No.27593 of 2012
O R D E R:
Sri P. Govinda Rajulu, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that in the light of the orders passed by the respondent-Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, this contempt case may be closed reserving liberty to his client to pursue his remedies in accordance with law.
With the above liberty, the contempt case is closed. No costs.
________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J.
Date: October 24, 2014. BS B
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
CONTEMPT CASE No.226 of 2014 in WRIT PETITION No.27593 of 2012
Date: October 24, 2014
BSB
G. Venkata Swamy
Sri Purnachandar Rao
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
