This is a dismissal by single judge on the ground of non-prosecution, without substantive reasoning or application of specific law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
Writ Petition No.13753 of 2004
Date: 18.10.2014
Between:
G. Sivaiah … Petitioner And
The Cantonment Board Secunderabad, rep. by its Executive Officer, Secunderabad & another
… Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
Writ Petition No.13753 of 2004
ORDER:
This matter was directed to be listed ‘for dismissal’, as there was no representation for the petitioner or his counsel on 26.09.2014.
2. Today, the matter appears under the caption ‘for dismissal’, yet there is no representation.
3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for nonprosecution. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand dismissed in consequence. No order as to costs.
SANJAY KUMAR, J
Date: 18.10.2014 BSS
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
28
Writ Petition No.13753 of 2004
Date: 18.10.2014
BSS
G. Sivaiah
The Cantonment Board Secunderabad
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
