The High Court dismissed the appeal by relying on earlier judgments, without recording any substantive facts or legal propositions, resulting in a thin order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
APPEAL SUIT No.956 OF 2002
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice R. Subhash Reddy)
It is submitted by the learned counsel for appellant as well as the learned Government Pleader for respondent that the subject matter of this appeal is squarely covered by earlier judgments passed by this Court in A.S.Nos.1877 of 2001 and 1628 of 2001, which were dismissed.
Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for parties, this appeal is also dismissed following the aforesaid judgments and for the reasons recorded therein. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this appeal, shall stand closed. No costs.
JUSTICE R.SUBHASH
REDDY
JUSTICE A. SHANKAR
NARAYANA
31st January, 2014
MD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
APPEAL SUIT No.956 OF 2002 (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice R.Subhash Reddy)
31st January, 2014
MD
R. Subhash Reddy
A. Shankar Narayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
