The court dismissed a civil revision petition as infructuous. No substantive legal principles were laid down. Miscellaneous petitions were disposed of.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; Miscellaneous Petitions disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
AND
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5036 OF 2002
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Subhash Reddy)
Sri P. Prabhakara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that cause in this revision petition does not survive requiring any further adjudication, as such, the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this revision stand disposed of.
___________________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J
___________________________ A. SHANKAR NARAYANA, J
January 30, 2014. PV
R. Subhash Reddy
A. Shankar Narayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
