Dismissed
R. Raja Gopal Naidu v. The State of A.P.
Telangana HCAS/391/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
R.SUBHASH REDDY AND HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE…
What the court decided
AI extract
R.SUBHASH REDDY AND HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY AND HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
APPEAL SUIT No.391 of 2006
JUDGMENT : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Subhash Reddy)
As there was no representation for the appellant on 18.12.2014, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “FOR DISMISSAL”.
2. Even today, despite the matter being listed under the caption “FOR DISMISSAL”, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant.
3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
____________________________ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH
REDDY
___________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO 26.12.2014. Msr
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY AND
HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
APPEAL SUIT No.391 of 2006
26.12.2014 Msr
R. Subhash Reddy
B. Siva Sankara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court