Bandari Rathnaiah v. Smt. Haji Begum , Haji Maa

Telangana HC6 Dec 2014AS/264/1997

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

¶1

ÐÏà¡±á>þÿ

¶2

=?þÿÿÿ<�ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ð¿} bjbjqPqP ?::5Gÿÿÿÿÿÿ¤’’’’’’’¦® ® ® 8æ ¦8$"""DDD!8#8#8#8#8#8#8¢9h <�V#8’#8’’DDÛ88'''”’D’D!8'!8''69,(’’%/Dà5²}í¤Ð® ³Xaõ7,N808}-¨<�Ä<�8%/`<�’%/Ð'#8#8ÏX~8¦¦¦$Êä¦¦¦Ê¦¦¦’’’’’’ÿÿÿÿTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY A.S.No. 264 OF 1997 JUDGMENT: Sri J.Bhaskar Rao, learned counsel, representing Sri D.Hanumantha Rao, learned counsel for the appellants, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal. Permission accorded. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous petitions in this appeal, if any, shall stand dismissed in consequence. No order as to costs. _____________________________ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J. Date: 06-12-2014. JSK PAGE PAGE 2 MSM, J. as_941_1995 /08;BCLMNQ ´ µ ¶ Ô ñßÍ»Í»¦’seWI;*

¶3

hµ+ƒh_CJOJQJ^JaJhÞ4CJOJQJ^JaJh_CJOJQJ^JaJhÈ^ÔCJOJQJ^JaJh˜0CJOJQJ^JaJh|_CJOJQJ^JaJ hàH×5CJOJQJ\^JaJ&hç úhp)5CJOJQJ\^JaJ)hç úhp)5>*CJOJQJ\^JaJ#h˜05>*CJOJQJ\^JaJ#h6i5>*CJOJQJ\^JaJ#hßd5>*CJOJQJ\^JaJh J)hßdCJOJQJ^J/0DNò µ ¶ Ô 1 5 7 8 : ; ÷êÝÓÂÂÂµ¨ž””‹‹dð¤ dð¤xgd_ dð¤xgd6i$dð¤xa$gd6i$dð¤xa$gdÇ<�$„Ðdà¤x„Ða$gdÇ<� dh¤gd˜0$dà¤a$gdÕ+º$dð¤a$gdK,UdðgdÃ5 | ýýÔ æ é $ % ' ( * 0 5 6 8 9 ; < > ? A B H I J L O P V W òáòÊ¶¥”ƒrƒr¥jfjfjfjf\V\VRV\V\hÅ;Ï hÅ;Ï0JjhÅ;Ï0JUh< jh< U hŒ0õCJOJQJ\]^JaJ h˜0CJOJQJ\]^JaJ hÕbeCJOJQJ\]^JaJ h§3ÁCJOJQJ\]^JaJ&h_56CJOJQJ\]^JaJ,hµ+ƒh_56CJOJQJ\]^JaJ hµ+ƒh_CJOJQJ^JaJh_CJOJQJ^JaJ; = > @ A J K L M N O Z [ \ d z { | } øöøöêèöÙÙÙÊÅÅÀÀöö¶ dð¤xgd_$a$$a$$„üÿ„&#$a$gd¯ò$„üÿ„&#$a$gdÕ+º„üÿ„&#$gdÕ+ºdð¤W X Y Z d f g j n o { | } ôêäàÜàØàØàÔÃ h§3ÁCJOJQJ\]^JaJh< h|_h6ihÅ;Ï hÅ;Ï0JjhÅ;Ï0JUhÂ ‹0JmHnHu= 0&P1hP:p_°Ð/ °ÀN!°"°#$%°°Ð°ÐÐ†œJ@ñÿJNormald¤ÈCJ_HJaJmH sH tH DA@òÿ¡DDefault Paragraph FontVióÿ³VTable Normal :Vö4Ö4Ö laö(kôÿÁ(No ListPòP Footnote Textdð¤CJ^J_HaJTþ¢TFootnote Text CharCJOJQJ^J_HaJD&¢DFootnote ReferenceH*^J>@">Header ÆH$dð¤2þO¢12Header Char^J> @B>Footer ÆH$dð¤2þ¢Q2Footer Char^J.)@¢a.Page NumberP>@rPTitle$dà¤a$5CJOJQJ\^JaJRB@‚R Body Text$dà¤xa$CJOJQJ^JaJnC@’nBody Text Indent$„Ðdð¤x^„Ða$6CJOJQJ]^JaJ´þO¢´BNormal + Tahoma,14 pt,Justified,After: 6 pt,Line spacing:

Bandari Rathnaiah Vs Smt. Haji Begum , Haji Maa — Telangana HC (2014) — LawSathi Research

¶6

£ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ‰Œ~˜Ð@áÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÑsý~0¾/ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ„ „0ýÆ ^„ „0ýo(()€ „„˜þÆ^„„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „Ø „LÿÆØ ^„Ø „Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „¨„˜þÆ¨^„¨„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „x„˜þÆx^„x„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „H„LÿÆH^„H„Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „„˜þÆ^„„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „è„˜þÆè^„è„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „¸„LÿÆ¸^„¸„Lÿ‡hˆH.„8„˜þÆ8^„8„˜þo(.€ „„˜þÆ^„„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „Ø „LÿÆØ ^„Ø „Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „¨„˜þÆ¨^„¨„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „x„˜þÆx^„x„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „H„LÿÆH^„H„Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „„˜þÆ^„„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „è„˜þÆè^„è„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „¸„LÿÆ¸^„¸„Lÿ‡hˆH.„8„˜þÆ8^„8„˜þ^J.„ „˜þÆ ^„ „˜þ^J.„p„˜þÆp^„p„˜þ^J.„@„˜þÆ@^„@„˜þ^J.„„˜þÆ^„„˜þ^J. „à„˜þÆà^„à„˜þ^J.„°„˜þÆ°^„°„˜þ^J.„€„˜þÆ€^„€„˜þ^J.„P„˜þÆP^„P„˜þ^J.„8„0ýÆ8^„8„0ýo(.€ „ „˜þÆ ^„ „˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „p„LÿÆp^„p„Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „@„˜þÆ@^„@„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „„˜þÆ^„„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „à„LÿÆà^„à„Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „°„˜þÆ°^„°„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „€„˜þÆ€^„€„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „P„LÿÆP^„P„Lÿ‡hˆH. „ „0ýÆ ^„ „0ýo(()€ „„˜þÆ^„„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „Ø „LÿÆØ ^„Ø „Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „¨„˜þÆ¨^„¨„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „x„˜þÆx^„x„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „H„LÿÆH^„H„Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „„˜þÆ^„„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „è„˜þÆè^„è„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „¸„LÿÆ¸^„¸„Lÿ‡hˆH.„ „0ýÆ ^„ „0ýo()€ „„˜þÆ^„„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „Ø „LÿÆØ ^„Ø „Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „¨„˜þÆ¨^„¨„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „x„˜þÆx^„x„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „H„LÿÆH^„H„Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „„˜þÆ^„„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „è„˜þÆè^„è„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „¸„LÿÆ¸^„¸„Lÿ‡hˆH. „ „0ýÆ ^„ „0ýo(()€ „„˜þÆ^„„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „Ø „LÿÆØ ^„Ø „Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „¨„˜þÆ¨^„¨„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „x„˜þÆx^„x„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „H„LÿÆH^„H„Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „„˜þÆ^„„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „è„˜þÆè^„è„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „¸„LÿÆ¸^„¸„Lÿ‡hˆH.„8„˜þÆ8^„8„˜þo(.€ „„˜þÆ^„„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „Ø „LÿÆØ ^„Ø „Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „¨„˜þÆ¨^„¨„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „x„˜þÆx^„x„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „H„LÿÆH^„H„Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „„˜þÆ^„„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „è„˜þÆè^„è„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „¸„LÿÆ¸^„¸„Lÿ‡hˆH. „ „0ýÆ ^„ „0ýo(()€ „„˜þÆ^„„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „Ø „LÿÆØ ^„Ø „Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „¨„˜þÆ¨^„¨„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „x„˜þÆx^„x„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „H„LÿÆH^„H„Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „„˜þÆ^„„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „è„˜þÆè^„è„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „¸„LÿÆ¸^„¸„Lÿ‡hˆH.„8„˜þÆ8^„8„˜þo(()€ „„˜þÆ^„„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „Ø „LÿÆØ ^„Ø „Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „¨„˜þÆ¨^„¨„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „x„˜þÆx^„x„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „H„LÿÆH^„H„Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „„˜þÆ^„„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „è„˜þÆè^„è„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „¸„LÿÆ¸^„¸„Lÿ‡hˆH. „p„0ýÆp^„p„0ýo(()€ „Ø „˜þÆØ ^„Ø „˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „¨„LÿÆ¨^„¨„Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „x„˜þÆx^„x„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „H„˜þÆH^„H„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „„LÿÆ^„„Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „è„˜þÆè^„è„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „¸„˜þÆ¸^„¸„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „ˆ„LÿÆˆ^„ˆ„Lÿ‡hˆH.¾'D[ xVjb•‹0m@Ðs·üyé;Ë$‰Œ~§]X×PbKÅ}Ñsý~ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ²+’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @vž¦N @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @brš lM6 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @®ÆÔ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @>×ž9 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @Hú´} @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @Ö±¶s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @œœ~ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @vOè, @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @µŒ• @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @.åþèj5?"SÉXëd#tk)ekÒ?fìk)PDC^ª#¶%Þ~„ sEb6iO& < îO ŸVÔdfŽ,9CçX˜c%vâIvÎ—ÖAtO^ÒqQW#ºjhA+Y’y:ØhÏ$¾;íuê}ÁQ ûq 9~ ¾'"P;"Œ".r"3#ˆy#þ$( $M$îe$þ%Ô&$&%(&¾l&ES'¤('_(ž%) J)p)q)è7<]+D,« ,Â ,n8,M,ü>- Y-‚n-<.˜0Q0ûo0£q0 ´1Z61¬V1ûl12ð~2;3ÇJ3Þ4«4þb4Á#5íf5w<6ä77ÿt8÷y8r9H9Nw9T:&:›H:% ;°V;Aw;Ç<�7<�‹3<�;<�><�Ö~<�ÒL= Z=“O>hk>8)?%@ÌE@¨+B&bBìuBcDŸEùEE¿NEfEEzGH*

Bandari Rathnaiah v. Smt. Haji Begum , Haji Maa

A compact analysis

Case details

Similar cases

B.G. Rama Krishna Vs Smt. M.L. Sharada

Smt. K. Sampoornamma (Died) per LRs a- 2 to 4 Vs Thiruvakadu Jagadeswari

Kondru Ramulu Vs Kondru Ramayya

S. Venugopal Vs A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corpn.

Bandari Rathnaiah v. Smt. Haji Begum , Haji Maa

A compact analysis

Case details

Similar cases

B.G. Rama Krishna Vs Smt. M.L. Sharada

Smt. K. Sampoornamma (Died) per LRs a- 2 to 4 Vs Thiruvakadu Jagadeswari

Kondru Ramulu Vs Kondru Ramayya

S. Venugopal Vs A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corpn.

M.Satyavatamma Vs v.Prabhavathi

G. Subramanyam Reddy, S/o Late G Narsimha Reddy, Vs The State of A.P.