The appeal suit was dismissed as withdrawn after counsel for appellants represented the matter had been settled out of court and seeking permission to withdraw the filed appeal.
Permission to withdraw the appeal granted; Appeal Suit dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
APPEAL SUIT No.234 OF 2009
Date: 24.03.2014
Between: T.Rani Bai and four others And Smt. Tati Sakku Bai And thirteen others
… Appellants
… Respondents
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
APPEAL SUIT No.234 OF 2009
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Ms. Justice G.Rohini)
It is represented by the learned counsel for the appellants that the matter has been settled between the parties out of Court. A memo to that effect signed by the appellants has been filed vide USR.No.322/2014 dated 21.03.2014. Under the circumstances, the learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the appeal.
Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Appeal Suit, shall stand closed.
____________ G.ROHINI, J
_________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J
Date: 24.03.2014 Mva
T. Rani Bai and four others
Smt. Tati Sakku Bai and thirteen others
G. ROHINI
T. SUNIL CHOWDARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
