The High Court disposed of an appeal filed against a decree partly decreeing a suit. The appeal was settled via a compromise recorded by the District Legal Services Authority, Warangal, accepted on 26-09-2014.
The appeal is disposed of based on the recorded compromise between the parties; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
Appeal Suit No.1372 of 1996
Date: 02-12-2014
Between:
Bhoopathi Rajeswar
.. Appellant
AND
Bhoopathi Suvarna and others
.. Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY Appeal Suit No.1372 of 1996
ORDER:
The present appeal is filed by the appellant being aggrieved by the decree and judgment dated 06-08-1992 in O.S.No.40 of 1985 passed by the II Additional Subordinate Judge, Warangal partly decreeing the suit with costs.
2. During the pendency of the appeal, ASMP.No.785 of 2014 was filed seeking a direction to transmit the records of this appeal to the Lok Adalat, District Legal Services Authority at Warangal to enable the said authority to record compromise among the parties and this court vide order dated 23-04-2014 allowed the said application for transmitting the record of the appeal.
3. As per the directions of this court dated 23-04-2014, the District Legal Services Authority, Warangal, through its docket proceedings dated
26-09-2014, recorded memorandum of compromise as per the terms and conditions mentioned therein and the said proceedings
are placed before the court, wherein it is stated that on 26-09-2014 all the parties present and the memorandum of compromise under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC already filed were explained to the parties and they agreed and accepted the terms of compromise and reported the acceptance of the terms of compromise without any coercion and with full consent. It is stated by the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent/2nd defendant that the possession was handed over to the plaintiff in terms of clause-3 of the memorandum of compromise.
4. In view of said compromise recorded by the District Legal Services Authority, Warangal on 26-09-2014, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the said compromise recorded by the District Legal Services Authority, Warangal, which shall form part of the record. There shall be no order as to costs.
_____________________ A. RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
Date: 02-12-2014
Ksn
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhoopathi Rajeswar
Bhoopathi Suvarna
A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
