A writ petition was dismissed as non-prosecuted by an order of non-availability, resulting in vacation of interim orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN
Present
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.8592 of 2013
Between:
V. Rajendran & 3 others
.. Petitioners
AND
The District Collector
(Land Acquisition), Chittoor & 2 others
.. Respondents
The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.8592 of 2013
ORDER:
There is no representation when the case is called. On earlier two occasions also, there is no representation.
2. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. The interim orders granted earlier stands vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending in this writ petition, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________ P.NAVEEN RAO, J
Date: 24th December, 2013
KL
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.8592 of 2013
Date: 24th December, 2013
KL
V. Rajendran and 3 others
District Collector (Land Acquisition) and 2 others
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
