The petitioners contended that nothing remains for adjudication on merits due to subsequent events. The court consequently dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI And
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
WRIT PETITION No.7108 of 2003
Dated: 04.09.2013
Between: Mandala Kista Reddy and 29 others .. Petitioners And The Ramagundam Municipality Karimnagar District and anothers
.. Respondents
HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI And
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
WRIT PETITION No.7108 of 2003
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Ms. Justice G.Rohini)
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in view of the subsequent events, nothing survives for adjudication on merits at this point of time.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
_____________ G.ROHINI, J
__________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
Date: 04.09.2013 KLP
Mandala Kista Reddy and 29 others
The Ramagundam Municipality Karimnagar District
G.ROHINI
CHALLA KODANDA RAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
