A commercial tax writ petition was dismissed without representation by the petitioner and without recording arguments.
No relief; the petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI And
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
WRIT PETITION No.24119 OF 2013
Dated: 03.09.2013
Between: Samrudhi Marketing Corporation Ltd. .. Petitioner And The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Commercial Tax Officer and another
.. Respondents
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI And
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
WRIT PETITION No.24119 OF 2013
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Ms. Justice G.Rohini)
Learned counsel for the petitioner was not present on 30.08.2013 and 02.09.2013. Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, even today there is no representation for the petitioner.
Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
____________
G.ROHINI, J
____________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
Date: 03.09.2013 Ivd
Samrudhi Marketing Corporation Ltd.
The State of Andhra Pradesh
G.ROHINI
CHALLA KODANDA RAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
